Name:
_________________________ Story
Title: _____________________________
RUBRIC FOR SCORING THE SHORT STORY
|
|
Distinguished (or
"WOW!") A-A+ |
Proficient (or "Pretty
Decent") B-B+ |
Satisfactory (or
"Fair") C-C+ |
Unsatisfactory (or
"Needs A D and below |
|
Title |
Title is
creative, sparks interest and is related to the story and topic. |
Title is related
to the story and topic. |
Title is
present, but does not appear to be related to the story and topic. |
Missing. |
|
Exposition and Resolution |
Creative exposition and
conclusion; conflict is clearly introduced and resolved. It is very easy for the reader to understand the problem
the main characters face and why it is a problem. Compelling
introduction and profound conclusion. |
Solid exposition that has a
"catchy" intro and solid resolution; conflict is clearly introduced
and resolved. Narrative provides
insight about the theme for the reader. It is fairly easy for the reader to
understand the problem the main characters face and why it is a problem. |
Basic needs of exposition
and resolution are met though intent may not be totally clear; clear topic
sentences. The reader may have learned something about the theme from the
story. It is fairly easy to understand the problem the character(s) face but
it is not clear why this is a problem |
Exposition and/or resolution
is either too short, missing, or confusing. Neither
the author nor the reader has learned anything about the theme. It is not
clear what the problem or conflict is. |
|
Characters |
The main characters
are named and clearly described in text as well as pictures. Most readers
could describe the characters accurately. The character seems like a real
person. |
The main
characters are named and described. Most readers would have some idea of what
the characters looked like. Characters are believable. |
The main
characters are named. The reader knows very little about the characters.
Characters seem flat, undeveloped. |
It is hard to
tell who the main characters are. |
|
Dialogue |
There is an
appropriate amount of dialogue to bring the characters to life and it is
always clear which character is speaking. The format and punctuation are
clear and error-free. The characters actions have been incorporated into the
dialogue. |
There is
dialogue in this story, but it is always clear which character is speaking.
The format and punctuation are mostly correct. Some action has been
incorporated into the dialogue. |
There is not
quite enough dialogue in this story, but it is always clear which character
is speaking. There are errors in the
format and punctuation, but it is still readable. There is not enough action
described to bring the dialogue to life. |
It is not clear
which character is speaking. |
|
Conflict |
There is real
action in this story. Action verbs (active voice) are used to describe what
is happening in the story. The story is exciting! |
There is action
in the story. Several action verbs are used to describe what is happening in
the story, but the word choice doesn't make the story as exciting as it could
be. |
A variety of
verbs (passive voice) are used and describe the action accurately but not in
a very exciting way. |
Little variety
seen in the verbs that are used. The story seems a little boring. |
|
Setting |
Many vivid,
descriptive words are used to tell when and where the story took place |
Some vivid,
descriptive words are used to tell the audience when and where the story took
place. |
The reader can
figure out when and where the story took place, but the author didn't supply
much detail. |
The reader has
trouble figuring out when and where the story took place. |
|
Grammar,
Mechanics, Punctuation |
Stylistically sophisticated,
using high level words with a notable awareness of audience,
varies sentence structure. Demonstrates control over conventions with almost
no errors. Excellent paragraphs. |
Takes risks with vocabulary,
demonstrates awareness of audience, varies sentence structure, Demonstrates control over
conventions with few errors. Good paragraphs. |
Uses appropriate language,
with some awareness of audience, occasionally makes effective use of sentence
structure Demonstrates partial control
over conventions, errors do not hinder comprehension. Paragraphs need work. |
Relies on basic vocabulary,
with little awareness of audience. Shows some attempt to vary sentence
structure or length for effect, but with uneven success. Demonstrates some
control over conventions, some errors may hinder comprehension. Information
is unfocused or confusing; paragraphs
too long, too short, or indented |
|
Creativity |
The story
contains many creative details and/or descriptions that contribute to the
reader's enjoyment. The author has really used his imagination. Gives reader dynamic impression; aptly uses dialogue
and description to show; creative transitions; uses similes/metaphors;
explores inner qualities of characters; narrates adeptly; weaves essential
facts and elements into narrative artfully. |
The story
contains a few creative details and/or descriptions that contribute to the
reader's enjoyment. The author has used his imagination. Gives reader vivid picture and deep understanding of
theme; sophisticated transitions; uses dialogue and description to illustrate
plot; creative presentation. |
The story
contains a few creative details and/or descriptions, but they distract from
the story. The author has tried to use his imagination. Recounts event but does so in a basic, predictable
and/or awkward way; little or no similes/metaphors; awkward transitions; too
much telling and not enough dialogue and description. |
There is little
evidence of creativity in the story. The author does not seem to have used
much imagination. Uses sweeping
generalizations with no supporting details; little or no dialogue or
description; missing or confusing transitions. |
|
Requirements |
All of the
requirements were met. |
Almost all
(about 90%) the requirements were met. |
Most (about 75%)
of the requirements were met. |
Many
requirements were not met. |
|
Effort & Improvement/Revision |
Evidence of substantial
time; student is working at highest potential. Student sought help in or out
of class from teacher and students. Revisions obvious. Professional.
Sophisticated. High level, active words are selected deliberately. There is
no more than one mechanical error in the entire story. Sentence structure is
varied. |
Evidence of time. Student is
working near highest potential; some improvement; polished presentation.
Student sought help in or out of class. Revisions made. Most vocabulary is
sophisticated and used properly. There are no more than 3 mechanical errors. |
Adequate amount of time is
evident; similar errors in previous stories; little or no improvement; neat
presentation. Some revisions made. Uses simple words and takes few risks.
Vocabulary is somewhat dull and/or repetitive. Narrative is legible but contains multiple
errors. |
Repeated errors; class-time
was not used productively; little or no time or care; sloppy; little or no
revision evident. Misuses basic vocabulary. Difficult to read because of a
number of distracting errors. |