Everything Matters! Essay
Select one of the prompts from below to help you formulate an interesting and arguable and precise thesis. Prove your thesis in a 1000 word essay using MLA parenthetical page citations.
Themes: Turn one or more into a thesis
Sophia [AKA wisdom, rational thinking, enlightenment, “know thyself,” etc.]
Amathia [AKA ignorance or unknowing, irrational, denial, etc.]
Secrecy / Conspiracy
Happiness / Love
Fathers or Mothers
Imprisonment / Freedom
To be a Hero or Not
Knowing vs. Not Knowing
Choice / Free Will
Fathers and Sons
Mothers and Sons
Luck / Chance
Existentialism or the Absurd [or some aspect of it / themes]
Some Fresh Ways to Attack the Beast
· Symbol buffet: examine the objects / actions
· It’s a Journey to ____: how is the character’s story a journey?
· Not Justifiable Reasons: examine how the character is wrong
· How to Beat the Monster: how does the character placate the terrible?
· Domino Effect/Jigsaw Puzzle
· Discuss a theme from above or another one you think of.
· Select a secondary character to analyze. How is this character used to develop a theme?
· Consider the forces that shape Junior and how that determines not only his choice for a do over but also how he lives it.
· Compare/contrast this novel with one other work we read this semester.
· Watch Donny Darko or Dark City (films) and write a comparative essay.
· What’s the deal with the structure?
· Have a better idea? Run with it!
OR Choose a quote to use as your spring board. Embed it in your intro, INTERPRET it in your own words and write a thesis statement that supports how your interpretation is supported in the text (thesis).
· “We’re here because we’re here because we’re here because we’re here.” – WWI Trench Song.
· “Everything matters.”
· “Everything matters and nothing matters.”
· “Life has a lovely texture.”
[This is the whole passage (you could use the whole passage or part): "Life's always been a business of working hard and fighting the cold... The earth's always been a lonely place, millions of miles from the next planet. And no matter how long the human race might have lived, the end would have come some night. Those things don't matter. What matters is that life is good. It has a lovely texture, like some thick fur of the petals of flowers--you've never seen those, but you know our ice-flowers--or like the texture of flames, never twice the same. It makes everything else worthwhile. And that's as true for the last man as the first." -- Pa in Fritz Leiber's "A Pail of Air"]
· Select a quote from the novel to use as your lens. State it, interpret it, apply it to the work.
· Select a quote from anywhere that is relevant to use as your lens. State it, interpret it, apply it to the work.
DO! DO! List
NO! NO! List!
· No “I”; No “you”
Notes: Existentialism: Crash Course Philosophy #16 (on YOUTUBE)
How do we find meaning? God, love, money shopping?
Essence? Given purpose by God?
A sense of meaning is something we all crave / need
We dedicate time and energy trying to create meaning – religion, social justice, etc.
Essentialism. Plato and Aristotle à everything has an essence which defines what it is (knife; blade is defining function)
Our essences exist before being born, and we should live up to our essence, born to be a certain thing.
Sartre: what if we exist first and it’s up to us to define our essence. Birth first, we determine how we choose to live. NO set path. Prior – God defined paths. Not all Existentialists are atheists, though. God may exist but does not provide meaning.
We are born into a universe which lacks any real importance. THE ABSURDà search for answers in an answerless world. We cry and get no response. That is ABSURD.
There is no reason for anything. No fairness. No rules.
WWII Horrors of war abandon any belief in an ordered world. When Nazis became possible meaning became harder to find.
Sartre: head on: not LACK OF MEANING BUT terrifying abundance of freedom. We are forced to design our own world, code. Condemned to be free. No authority to help. No people, powers.
Best: live authentically. ACCEPT THE FULL WEIGHT OF YOUR FREEDOM IN LIGHT OF THE ABSURD. Any meaning is created by YOU.
Bad Faith: refusal to accept the absurd. Pretending that something out there has meaning that you did not create.
Boy war mom. No answer because no moral theory. He had to make the choice, the only true choice. He used his values to decide.
Camus: not committing suicide is living
Your life can have meaning and nobody can tell you what to do. We have to put justice and order out there.
Most people experience a sense of existential dread at some point in their lives, a vague and often unarticulated anxiety about the purpose of struggle in the face of inevitable death. But for Junior Thibodeau, the protagonist of Everything Matters!, that dread is anything but vague; and it is fully articulated from the moment he is born. Junior is gifted and cursed with the certain knowledge of how and when the world will end, and that knowledge forces him to directly confront the great philosophical questions that have always been the abstract, if profoundly important, preoccupations of the human mind. What is morality? What is love? Does anything I do matter?
The narrative switches perspectives, from Junior’s family members and his lifelong love, Amy, to Junior himself, to the omniscient and unexplained voice in Junior’s brain. We learn that the Thibodeau clan is resilient and loving despite each member’s individual trauma or grief, and though that love is expressed torturously or not at all, it is strong enough to push the adult Junior to incredible heights of self-sacrifice and moral reckoning.
…perhaps the most surprising contradiction in this novel is that in grappling with the futility of existence and the certainty of death, Junior ultimately finds that despite all logic, everything—love, grief, joy, pain, and the most mundane activities—does, in fact, matter.
A CONVERSATION WITH RON CURRIE, JR.
Q. Who or what is the “voice” in Junior’s head? Did you ever want to reveal its identity, or did you always plan to leave that question unanswered?
I deliberately left the question open. It never seemed a good idea for a reveal—the story is busy enough, and to assign a name to the presence in Junior’s head would compromise its power as metaphor. Plus I like leaving big things up to the reader to decide for him- or herself. Too much of what I read lately panders and handholds, and as a consequence I think some readers have become conditioned to want to have every last detail of a story explained ad nauseam. There’s real, sublime pleasure in being allowed to filter a story through your own consciousness and fill in key blanks for yourself.
Q. Did you ever write or imagine a draft in which Junior actually succeeds in stopping the Destroyer of Worlds, actually saving the world?
I considered it, of course, but that would have been a cop-out. The whole point is that Junior needs to learn to accept and live with the eventual end of his life and everything he loves. Further, he needs to learn that no amount of struggling against that eventual doom will result in a different outcome, except that when it comes he’ll be alone and spent and heartbroken. Really Junior is sort of immature in his obsession with the Destroyer of Worlds, because the only difference between him and everyone else on the planet—each of whom comes to understand at some point in their life that we’re all hurtling inexorably toward oblivion—is that he knows his expiration date. And it cripples him. Most of us move forward in the face of our own certain knowledge, frightening and discouraging as it is.
Q. There is a strain of violence throughout the book: children suffer physical abuse, adults are mutilated, graphically described illness strikes people of all ages. What is the function of violence in this story?
The same function it has in real life—it’s a tremendous force that results in dramatic changes in both a person’s life and personality. Violence is partly responsible for turning John Sr. into the unflappable family man he is throughout the story. The memory of violence causes Debbie to descend into alcoholism so deeply that it resembles catatonia. Violence committed against Amy grants her the defiance and determination that are the hallmarks of her makeup, particularly when she’s faced with difficult choices or hardship.
Q. Considering the nature of your characters’ dilemmas, they seem surprisingly uninterested in religion. And your last book was titled God Is Dead. Why no mention of religion here?
Well, Debbie is devout, even at the apex of her addiction. I think the other characters’ lack of faith and piety reflect the sort of casually theistic society America seems to have become (shrill right-wingers notwithstanding; they’re still a minority, no matter how vocal). Most people I know sort of believe in god, but god as an indefinite concept, perhaps not even an entity, and certainly not a bearded man in the sky. A society in which one can choose a religion by flipping through the yellow pages is bound to spawn these types of people in large numbers, and the book reflects that.
Q. Certain events of the 80s and 90s—the Challenger explosion, the Oklahoma City bombing—are important turning points in Junior’s young life. Did these particular events affect you in a profound way?
Oh, sure. I was preternaturally sensitive to the big events of my childhood, though I had no better understanding of them than the average kid, I don’t think. I can remember planning a fort in the woods with a friend of mine for when the Libyans invaded circa 1986. This was around the time of the pissing match between Reagan and Gaddafi (remember how no one could reach a consensus on how to spell his name?) over international waters off the Libyan coast. So there we were, convinced the Libyans were going to invade the United States, going over plans on the playground for a sort of fallback shelter in the woods. There was a Rambo knife involved, too, if memory serves.
Q. Junior’s brother Rodney transforms from a “smart, and cunning, and mischievous” nemesis to a simple and guileless friend. His ignorant bliss contrasts sharply with Junior’s tortured brilliance. Why did you choose these dichotomies in creating Rodney’s character and portraying his relationship with Junior?
Rodney functions as Junior’s foil throughout their lives. First, he’s the typical older brother—bullying, jealous of the divided attentions of their mother. After the brain injury, Rodney’s happiness and serenity, when contrasted with Junior’s desperate unhappiness, serve as an omnipresent reminder that, as Junior himself says, “Smart’s got nothing to do with it.”
Q. The style of punctuation changes with the narrator throughout the book—sometimes quotation marks are used in the dialogue, sometimes paragraph breaks, and sometimes nothing at all. Was that something you decided on when you began writing the novel? Why?
It’s a simple and effective way to convey voice. Also pretty dangerous, but I like taking chances. That’s the sort of fiction I enjoy reading: the kind of writing that isn’t afraid to crash and burn. All these quiet, austere, studiously perfect narratives I see celebrated time and again—they’re fine for what they are, but I don’t get a sense that even the authors felt they were necessary. There’s no risk, no anima.
Q. We only hear from Debbie, Junior’s mother, in the first half of the book, after which her alcoholism and depression are chronicled by those around her. Why does she fall silent?
After a certain point early in the story, Debbie has no inner monologue that would make sense on the page, let alone move the story forward. She is way beyond an unreliable narrator. She’s in a sort of stasis, and so in order for the reader to understand what’s going on with her he has to be informed through others. By the time Debbie is well enough to speak for herself again, that part of the story is over.
Junior ultimately decides, in his “second life,” to focus on improving a doomed existence rather than attempting to escape it; he even encourages his daughter to campaign for an environment he knows will soon be destroyed. Do you think this was the right choice? Did you prefer the first ending, in which he worked feverishly to save himself, his father, and his world?
When presented with the opportunity to go back and “choose his own adventure,”
his best self among millions of possibilities, Junior chooses the same life
with one important difference, one decision to un-make. Do you think this plot
twist helps the novel succeed as a literary work?
Which of the multiple narrators did you most enjoy hearing from? Which did you
like the least?
How does Junior’s relationship with his family affect his decisions and,
ultimately, the fate of the world?
Were you surprised at the turn Junior’s life took after high school when Amy
left and he began his downward spiral? What were you expecting for him as a
young adult at that point in the novel?
In Chicago, Junior meets Reggie, an unstable multiple-amputee with murderous
ambitions. What role do you think Reggie plays in Junior’s life? Why does
Junior come so close to participating in Reggie’s plan and why does he back
Perhaps the most content character in this novel is Rodney after his brain is
damaged by an early drug addiction. Do you think ignorance is really bliss?
Amy is uncertain about whether to leave Earth even after she knows it will be destroyed
until Ralph, the old man they meet in the wilderness, convinces her to go. What
do you think it is about her encounter with Ralph that ultimately convinces
The novel’s argument is announced in its title: Everything matters. Did the author convince you of this conclusion?
What Shapes Us? According to You:
Luck and Chance